Meet us live at LEAP 2026
Book a meeting
Meet us live at LEAP 2026
Book a meeting
Meet us live at LEAP 2026
Book a meeting
Meet us live at LEAP 2026
Book a meeting
Meet us live at LEAP 2026
Book a meeting
Meet us live at LEAP 2026
Book a meeting
Meet us live at LEAP 2026
Book a meeting
Meet us live at LEAP 2026
Book a meeting
Meet us live at LEAP 2026
Book a meeting
Meet us live at LEAP 2026
Book a meeting

— Consulting & Strategy

Architecture that scales. Strategy that ships.

Senior engineers who have built at scale review your architecture, map your technical roadmap, and tell you exactly what to fix, what to defer, and why — in plain language.

Senior-only
Ex-FAANG & scale-up engineers
5–10 days
Typical engagement length
Actionable
No slide decks — real output

— Advisory Services

Six ways we improve your technical position.

Technical Roadmap

We map every initiative, dependency, and risk on a rolling 12-month engineering roadmap — prioritised by business impact.

3–5 days

Architecture Review

Deep audit of your system architecture: scalability bottlenecks, single points of failure, coupling risks, and migration paths.

4–7 days

Tech Stack Audit

Review of your stack, dependencies, security posture, and technical debt — with a severity-graded findings report.

2–4 days

CTO Advisory (Fractional)

Ongoing weekly advisory from a senior engineer — attending your engineering meetings, reviewing decisions, coaching your leads.

Monthly

Technical Due Diligence

Pre-acquisition or pre-investment code and architecture review — third-party, objective, and investor-ready.

3–5 days

Engineering Team Review

Assessment of team structure, seniority distribution, hiring gaps, and process maturity — with a concrete improvement plan.

2–3 days

— How It Works

From first call to final report in days.

Every engagement is time-boxed and outcome-focused. You know exactly what you will receive before work begins.

  1. Day 1

    Intake & Scoping

    90-min structured session mapping your current state, pain points, business context, and engagement objectives.

  2. Days 1–2

    Access & Discovery

    We review your codebase, architecture diagrams, infrastructure setup, and any existing documentation.

  3. Days 2–6

    Deep Analysis

    Senior engineer runs the full audit: findings catalogued, risks scored, patterns identified, and recommendations drafted.

  4. Day 7

    Findings Walkthrough

    Live session walking through every finding — not slides, but working documents you can act on immediately.

  5. Days 8–10

    Final Report & Roadmap

    Written deliverables: findings report, risk matrix, prioritised recommendations, and 12-month engineering roadmap.

Architecture Review · Session 3 of 4
Day 4 of 768% complete
Critical (2)

No circuit breaker on payment service — cascading failure risk

Database connection pool uncapped — memory exhaustion under load

Warning (5)

Monolith + 3 micro-services with inconsistent auth patterns

N+1 query pattern in product listing — no pagination at DB layer

+ 3 more findings

Healthy (14)CI/CD pipeline, test coverage >80%, dependency versioning

Full report delivered Day 7

— What You Receive

Documents you act on. Not ones you file away.

Every engagement produces tangible, working documents — not generic recommendations.

  • Findings Report

    Severity-graded catalogue of every issue found, with context, impact, and recommended fix for each.

  • Risk Matrix

    Prioritised list of technical risks mapped to business impact and effort to resolve — ready for board review.

  • Architecture Diagram

    Current-state and recommended future-state system diagrams delivered as Mermaid source and PDF.

  • 12-Month Technical Roadmap

    Quarter-by-quarter engineering initiatives, prioritised by ROI and risk reduction for your specific context.

  • Stack & Dependency Audit

    Full dependency tree, CVE scan results, licence risk assessment, and upgrade path recommendations.

  • Executive Summary

    One-page non-technical summary suitable for board presentation, investor update, or leadership review.

  • Findings Walkthrough Recording

    Full recording of the live review session — shareable with your team and referenced during implementation.

Technical Roadmap · Q3 2025 – Q2 2026
Q3 2025Foundation
Migrate auth to OAuth 2.0
Critical
Resolve 2 critical findings
Critical
Add circuit breaker layer
High
Q4 2025Performance
Implement Redis caching
High
Fix N+1 query patterns
High
DB connection pooling
Medium
Q1 2026Scale
Extract notification service
Medium
Introduce API gateway
High
Load testing suite
Medium
Q2 2026Resilience
Multi-region failover
High
Full observability stack
Medium
SLA monitoring & alerts
Medium

Delivered as a living Notion document + PDF

— Who This Is For

Built for leaders making technical decisions.

Technical Founders

"I don't have a CTO but I'm making architecture decisions I'm not confident in."

A senior engineer reviews every technical choice and trade-off — you get the oversight without the full-time hire.

Scale-up CTOs

"We've grown fast. Our architecture is a mess and I need a third party to tell me how bad it really is."

Objective audit with no internal politics — a ranked list of what to fix, what to defer, and in what order.

PE / VC Firms

"We're acquiring a company. We need a credible technical due diligence report in five days."

Investor-ready report covering code quality, architecture risk, team maturity, and hidden technical liabilities.

Engineering Leads

"I need to convince my board to invest in platform work. I need an external voice backing the case."

A documented findings report and roadmap that gives you the evidence to justify the engineering investment.

— Let's Start

Get a clear view of your technical position.

Book a 30-minute scoping call. We will define the engagement, the timeline, and the deliverables — before you commit to anything.